Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Incidence of Gastric Cancer Between 1980 and 2022.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to assess the secular trend of the global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection in adults and children/adolescents and to show its relation to that of gastric cancer incidence. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to calculate overall prevalence, adjusted by multivariate meta-regression analysis. The incidence rates of gastric cancer were derived from the Global Burden of Disease Study and Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. RESULTS: Of the 16,976 articles screened, 1748 articles from 111 countries were eligible for analysis. The crude global prevalence of H pylori has reduced from 52.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.6%-55.6%) before 1990 to 43.9% (95% CI, 42.3%-45.5%) in adults during 2015 through 2022, but was as still as high as 35.1% (95% CI, 30.5%-40.1%) in children and adolescents during 2015 through 2022. Secular trend and multivariate regression analyses showed that the global prevalence of H pylori has declined by 15.9% (95% CI, -20.5% to -11.3%) over the last 3 decades in adults, but not in children and adolescents. Significant reduction of H pylori prevalence was observed in adults in the Western Pacific, Southeast Asian, and African regions. However, H pylori prevalence was not significantly reduced in children and adolescents in any World Health Organization regions. The incidence of gastric cancer has decreased globally and in various countries where the prevalence of H pylori infection has declined. CONCLUSIONS: The global prevalence of H pylori infection has declined during the last 3 decades in adults, but not in children and adolescents. The results raised the hypothesis that the public health drive to reduce the prevalence of H pylori as a strategy to reduce the incidence of gastric cancer in the population should be confirmed in large-scale clinical trials.

Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in the Asia-Pacific region between 1990 and 2022: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We previously showed rising primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori during 1990-2015 in the Asia-Pacific region. However, whether primary antibiotic resistance continues to rise is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to assess the latest prevalence of H pylori antibiotic resistance in this region. METHODS: We did an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomised controlled trials published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library between Jan 1, 1990, and July 12, 2023. Studies investigating primary H pylori resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, or tetracycline in individuals naive to eradication therapy in the Asia-Pacific region (as defined by the UN geoscheme) were eligible for inclusion. There were no language restrictions. Studies that focused on specific subpopulations (eg, children) were excluded. Using a standardised extraction form, two authors independently reviewed and extracted summary data from all eligible articles. The updated prevalence of antibiotic resistance was generated by meta-analysis under a random-effects model and subgroup analyses were done by countries and periods of study. Between-study variability was assessed by use of I2. The study is registered in PROSPERO, CRD42022339956. FINDINGS: A total of 351 studies, including 175 new studies and 176 studies from our previous analysis, were included in this meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of primary antibiotic resistance of H pylori between 1990 and 2022 was 22% (95% CI 20-23; I2=96%) for clarithromycin, 52% (49-55; I2=99%) for metronidazole, 26% (24-29; I2=96%) for levofloxacin, 4% (3-5; I2=95%) for tetracycline, and 4% (3-5; I2=95%) for amoxicillin. Prevalence varied considerably between countries and across study periods. From 1990 to 2022, the prevalence of primary resistance increased for clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin but remained stable for amoxicillin and tetracycline. The latest primary resistance prevalences were 30% (95% CI 28-33; I2=93%) for clarithromycin, 61% (55-66; I2=99%) for metronidazole, 35% (31-39; I2=95%) for levofloxacin, 4% (2-6; I2=96%) for tetracycline, and 6% (4-8; I2=96%) for amoxicillin in the Asia-Pacific region. INTERPRETATION: Treatment guidelines should be adapted in response to the rising primary resistance of key antibiotics for H pylori eradication. A global policy to control and monitor the antibiotic resistance of H pylori is urgently needed. FUNDING: Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan, National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan, and National Taiwan University. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Molecular testing-guided therapy versus susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line and third-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: two multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trials.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is an important causal factor of gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease and is associated with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and functional dyspepsia. In H pylori strains, point mutations in the 23S rRNA and gyrA genes are associated with clarithromycin resistance and levofloxacin resistance, respectively. Whether the efficacy of molecular testing-guided therapy is non-inferior to that of susceptibility testing-guided therapy for H pylori eradication is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of molecular testing-guided therapy and traditional culture-based susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line and third-line treatment of H pylori infection. METHODS: We did two multicentre, open-label randomised trials in Taiwan. In trial 1 (done at seven hospitals), treatment-naive individuals infected with H pylori who were aged 20 years or older were eligible for study inclusion. In trial 2 (done at six hospitals), individuals aged 20 years or older who failed treatment after two or more eradication therapies for H pylori infection were eligible for enrolment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either molecular testing-guided therapy or susceptibility testing-guided therapy. The randomisation sequence was generated by computer using permuted block randomisation with a block size of 4. All investigators were masked to the randomisation sequence. Clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance were determined by agar dilution test for measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group, and by PCR and direct sequencing for detection of 23S rRNA and gyrA mutations in the molecular testing-guided therapy group. Study participants received clarithromycin sequential therapy, levofloxacin sequential therapy, or bismuth quadruple therapy according to the resistance status to clarithromycin and levofloxacin. The 13C-urease breath test was used to determine the status of H pylori infection at least 6 weeks after eradication therapy. The primary outcome was the eradication rate by intention-to-treat analysis. The frequency of adverse effects was analysed in patients with available data. The prespecified margins for non-inferiority were 5% for trial 1 and 10% for trial 2. The trials are ongoing for post-eradication follow-up and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03556254 for trial 1, and NCT03555526 for trial 2. FINDINGS: Between March 28, 2018, and April 23, 2021, 560 eligible treatment-naive patients with H pylori infection were recruited and randomly assigned to the molecular testing-guided therapy group or the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group in trial 1. Between Dec 28, 2017, and Oct 27, 2020, 320 eligible patients with refractory H pylori infection were recruited and randomly assigned to the molecular testing-guided therapy group or the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group in trial 2. 272 men and 288 women were recruited for trial 1, and 98 men and 222 women were recruited for trial 2. In first-line H pylori treatment, infection was eradicated in 241 (86%, 95% CI 82-90) of 280 patients in the molecular testing-guided therapy group and 243 (87%, 83-91) of 280 patients in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group by intention-to-treat analysis (p=0·81). In third-line H pylori treatment, infection was eradicated in 141 (88%, 83-93) of 160 patients in the molecular testing-guided therapy group and 139 (87%, 82-92) of 160 patients in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group by intention-to-treat analysis (p=0·74). The difference in the eradication rate between the molecular testing-guided therapy group and the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group was -0·7% (95% CI -6·4 to 5·0; non-inferiority p=0·071) in trial 1 and 1·3% (-6·0 to 8·5; non-inferiority p=0·0018 in trial 2 by intention-to-treat analysis. We found no difference in adverse effects across both treatment groups in trial 1 and trial 2. INTERPRETATION: Molecular testing-guided therapy was similar to susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line therapy and non-inferior to susceptibility testing guided therapy in third-line treatment of H pylori infection, supporting the use of molecular testing-guided therapy for H pylori eradication. FUNDING: Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, and Centre of Precision Medicine of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan.

Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps : A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is considered effective in reducing delayed postpolypectomy bleeding risk, direct evidence supporting its safety in the general population remains lacking. OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether CSP would reduce delayed bleeding risk after polypectomy compared with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) in the general population. DESIGN: Multicenter randomized controlled study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03373136). SETTING: 6 sites in Taiwan, July 2018 through July 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Participants aged 40 years or older with polyps of 4 to 10 mm. INTERVENTION: CSP or HSP to remove polyps of 4 to 10 mm. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the delayed bleeding rate within 14 days after polypectomy. Severe bleeding was defined as a decrease in hemoglobin concentration of 20 g/L or more, requiring transfusion or hemostasis. Secondary outcomes included mean polypectomy time, successful tissue retrieval, en bloc resection, complete histologic resection, and emergency service visits. RESULTS: A total of 4270 participants were randomly assigned (2137 to CSP and 2133 to HSP). Eight patients (0.4%) in the CSP group and 31 (1.5%) in the HSP group had delayed bleeding (risk difference, -1.1% [95% CI, -1.7% to -0.5%]). Severe delayed bleeding was also lower in the CSP group (1 [0.05%] vs. 8 [0.4%] events; risk difference, -0.3% [CI, -0.6% to -0.05%]). Mean polypectomy time (119.0 vs. 162.9 seconds; difference in mean, -44.0 seconds [CI, -53.1 to -34.9 seconds]) was shorter in the CSP group, although successful tissue retrieval, en bloc resection, and complete histologic resection did not differ. The CSP group had fewer emergency service visits than the HSP group (4 [0.2%] vs. 13 [0.6%] visits; risk difference, -0.4% [CI, -0.8% to -0.04%]). LIMITATION: An open-label, single-blind trial. CONCLUSION: Compared with HSP, CSP for small colorectal polyps significantly reduces the risk for delayed postpolypectomy bleeding, including severe events. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Boston Scientific Corporation.

Second-line levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy versus bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication and long-term changes to the gut microbiota and antibiotic resistome: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin-based therapy or bismuth-based quadruple therapy are the recommended second-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication after failure of clarithromycin-based therapy. However, resistance to levofloxacin has increased in the past decade. Furthermore, little is known about the long-term effects of H pylori eradication on the antibiotic resistome. In this study, we compared these second-line eradication therapies for efficacy, tolerability, and short-term and long-term effects on the gut microbiota, antibiotic resistome, and metabolic parameters. METHODS: We did a multicentre, open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial at eight hospitals in Taiwan. Adult patients (age ≥20 years) with persistent H pylori infection after first-line clarithromycin-based therapy were randomly assigned (1:1, permuted block sizes of four) to receive levofloxacin-based sequential quadruple therapy for 14 days (EAML14; esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for 7 days, followed by esomeprazole 40 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and levofloxacin 250 mg for 7 days, all twice-daily) or bismuth-based quadruple therapy for 10 days (BQ10; esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily, bismuth tripotassium dicitrate 300 mg four times a day, tetracycline 500 mg four times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day). All investigators were masked to the randomisation sequence. The primary endpoint was H pylori eradication rate measured by 13C urea breath test 6 weeks after second-line treatment according to both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analysis. The microbiota composition and antibiotic resistome of faecal samples collected at baseline (before treatment) and at 2 weeks, 8 weeks, and 1 year after eradication therapy was profiled by shotgun metagenomic sequencing and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The frequency of adverse effects and changes in the gut microbiota and antibiotic resistome were assessed in all participants with available data. The trial is complete and registered with ClinicalTrails.gov, NCT03148366. FINDINGS: Between Feb 25, 2015, and Dec 11, 2020, 560 patients were randomly assigned to receive EAML14 or BQ10 (n=280 per group; 261 [47%] men and 299 [53%] women). Mean age was 55·9 years (SD 12·7) in the EAML14 group and 54·9 years (12·3) in the BQ10 group. Eradication of H pylori was achieved in 246 (88%) of 280 participants in the EAML14 group and 245 (88%) of 280 in the BQ10 group according to ITT analysis (risk difference -0·4%, 95% CI -5·8 to 5·1; p=0·90). In the per-protocol analysis, 246 (90%) of 273 participants in the EAML14 group and 245 (93%) of 264 participants in the BQ10 group achieved H pylori eradication (risk difference 2·7%, 95% CI -0·2 to 7·4; p=0·27). Transient perturbation of faecal microbiota diversity at week 2 was largely restored to basal state 1 year after EAML14 or BQ10. Diversity recovery was slower with BQ10, and recovery in species abundance was partial after both therapies. On shotgun sequencing, we observed significant increases in total resistome after EAML14 (p=0·0002) and BQ10 (p=4·3 × 10-10) at week 2, which were restored to pretreatment level by week 8. The resistance rates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ampicillin (ampicillin-sulbactam for K pneumonia), and various cephalosporins were significantly increased in the EAML14 group compared with in the BQ10 group at week 2, which were restored to pretreatment levels and showed no significant differences at week 8 and 1 year. The frequency of any adverse effects was significantly higher after BQ10 therapy (211 [77%] of 273 participants) than after EAML14 therapy (134 [48%] of 277; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: We found no evidence of superiority between levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy and bismuth-based quadruple therapy in the second-line treatment of H pylori infection. The transient increase in the antibiotic resistome and perturbation of faecal microbiota diversity were largely restored to pretreatment state from 2 months to 1 year after eradication therapy. FUNDING: The Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, and the Australian Federal Government through the St George and Sutherland Medical Research Foundation. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Declining trends of prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and incidence of gastric cancer in Taiwan: An updated cross-sectional survey and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the latest prevalence and secular trend of Helicobacter pylori infection and its association with the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults naive to H. pylori eradication received 13 C-urea breath test (13 C-UBT), H. pylori stool antigen test, and serology test during 2019-2020 in this prospective screening program. Children and adolescent aged between 7 and 19 years received 13 C-UBT for H. pylori screening. We also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the secular trend of prevalence of H. pylori from 1990 to 2020 in Taiwan. The secular trends of age-standardized incidence and mortality of gastric cancer were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. RESULTS: A total of 1494 participants were enrolled, including 294 children or adolescents and 1200 adults. The overall prevalence of active H. pylori infection by 13 C-UBT was 26.6% (397/1494), which was 30.8% in adults and 9.5% in adolescents/children. The age-standardized prevalence of active H. pylori infection was 32.3% in adults after adjustment of the population structure in Taiwan. Of the 29 studies including 38,597 subjects eligible for the meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of H. pylori infection decreased from 63.8% (95% CI: 55.9%-71%) in 1990-2000 to 28.2% (95% CI:21.8%-35.6%) in 2016-2020. The age-standardized incidence and mortality of gastric cancer have also declined from 15.2 to 10.75 per 100,000, respectively, in 1999 to 9.29 and 5.4 per 100,000, respectively, in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of H. pylori infection has declined in Taiwan, which correlates with the declining trends of age-standardized incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in Taiwan.

The efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus and rhamnosus in the reduction of bacterial load of Helicobacter pylori and modification of gut microbiota-a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Probiotics may alter the gut microbiota and may reduce antibiotic-related dysbiosis after H. pylori eradication. However, whether probiotics are effective in reducing the bacterial load of H. pylori and modifying the gut microbiota remains unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus in reducing the bacterial load of H. pylori and modifying the gut microbiota. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited 40 adult subjects with moderate to high bacterial loads of H. pylori, defined as a mean delta over baseline (DOB) value of the 13 C-urea breath test (13 C-UBT) of 10 or greater every 4 days 6 times. Eligible subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either probiotics containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus or placebo twice daily for 4 weeks. 13 C-UBT was measured weekly from the beginning of treatment to 2 weeks after treatment. Amplification of the V3 and V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA was performed for fecal microbiota. RESULTS: A total of 40 subjects were randomized to receive probiotics or placebo. The DOB value was significantly lower in the probiotic group than in the placebo group after 4 weeks of treatment (26.0 vs. 18.5, p = .045). The DOB value was significantly reduced compared to that at baseline in the probiotic group (18.5 vs. 26.7, p = .001) but not in the placebo group (26.0 vs. 25.0, p = .648). However, the eradication rate for H. pylori was 0% in both groups. There was no significant difference in the DOB values between the two groups 1 and 2 weeks after discontinuation of the probiotics. There were also no significant changes observed in the α-diversity and ß-diversity at week 4 compared to baseline in the probiotic group (p = .77 and 0.91) and the placebo group (p = .26 and 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus may reduce the bacterial load of H. pylori, there were no significant changes in the composition of gut microbiota. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02725138.

Screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for gastric cancer prevention: the Taipei global consensus.

OBJECTIVE: A global consensus meeting was held to review current evidence and knowledge gaps and propose collaborative studies on population-wide screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for prevention of gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: 28 experts from 11 countries reviewed the evidence and modified the statements using the Delphi method, with consensus level predefined as ≥80% of agreement on each statement. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was followed. RESULTS: Consensus was reached in 26 statements. At an individual level, eradication of H. pylori reduces the risk of GC in asymptomatic subjects and is recommended unless there are competing considerations. In cohorts of vulnerable subjects (eg, first-degree relatives of patients with GC), a screen-and-treat strategy is also beneficial. H. pylori eradication in patients with early GC after curative endoscopic resection reduces the risk of metachronous cancer and calls for a re-examination on the hypothesis of 'the point of no return'. At the general population level, the strategy of screen-and-treat for H. pylori infection is most cost-effective in young adults in regions with a high incidence of GC and is recommended preferably before the development of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia. However, such a strategy may still be effective in people aged over 50, and may be integrated or included into national healthcare priorities, such as colorectal cancer screening programmes, to optimise the resources. Reliable locally effective regimens based on the principles of antibiotic stewardship are recommended. Subjects at higher risk of GC, such as those with advanced gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia, should receive surveillance endoscopy after eradication of H. pylori. CONCLUSION: Evidence supports the proposal that eradication therapy should be offered to all individuals infected with H. pylori. Vulnerable subjects should be tested, and treated if the test is positive. Mass screening and eradication of H. pylori should be considered in populations at higher risk of GC.

Comparison of the effect of clarithromycin triple therapy with or without N-acetylcysteine in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether adjunctive N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may improve the efficacy of triple therapy in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection remains unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of 14-day triple therapy with or without NAC for the first-line treatment of H. pylori. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2018, 680 patients with H. pylori infection naïve to treatment were enrolled in this multicenter, open-label, randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive triple therapy with NAC [NAC-T14, dexlansoprazole 60 mg four times daily (q.d.); amoxicillin 1 g twice daily (b.i.d.), clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., NAC 600 mg b.i.d.] for 14 days, or triple therapy alone (T14, dexlansoprazole 60 mg q.d.; amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.) for 14 days. Our primary outcome was the eradication rates by intention to treat (ITT). Antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 gene polymorphism were determined. RESULTS: The ITT analysis demonstrated H. pylori eradication rates in NAC-T14 and T14 were 81.7% [276/338, 95% confidence interval (CI): 77.5-85.8%] and 84.3% (285/338, 95% CI 80.4-88.2%), respectively. In 646 participants who adhered to their assigned therapy, the eradication rates were 85.7% and 88.0% with NAC-T14 and T14 therapies, respectively. There were no differences in compliance or adverse effects. The eradication rates in subjects with clarithromycin-resistant, amoxicillin-resistant, or either clarithromycin/amoxicillin resistant strains were 45.2%, 57.9%, and 52.2%, respectively, for NAC-T14, and were 66.7%, 76.9%, and 70.0%, respectively, for T14. The efficacy of NAC-T14 and T14 was not affected by CYP2C19 polymorphism. CONCLUSION: Add-on NAC to triple therapy was not superior to triple therapy alone for first-line H. pylori eradication [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02249546].

Accuracy of rapid Helicobacter pylori antigen tests for the surveillance of the updated prevalence of H. pylori in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: The updated prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is lacking in Taiwan. We aimed to assess the accuracy of Vstrip® H. pylori Stool Antigen Rapid Test (Vstrip®HpSA) in the detection and surveillance of the updated prevalence of H. pylori in Taiwan. METHODS: A total of 347 adult subjects including 152 volunteers and 195 symptomatic patients were recruited. Stool samples were collected for detection of H. pylori using Vstrip® HpSA, ImmunoCard STAT!® HpSA and Premier Platinum HpSA® PLUS. All subjects who have completed the stool sample collections were included in the ITT analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Vstrip® HpSA were calculated compared to gold standard test with 13C-Urea breath test. RESULTS: The un-adjusted prevalence of H. pylori infection was 22.5% (95% CI: 18.3-27%) in 2018. The age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori was 21.8% in asymptomatic adults in Taiwan. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the Vstrip® HpSA, and ImmunoCard STAT!® HpSA tests were 91% (95% CI: 82-96%) versus 76.9% (95% CI: 66-86%), 97% (95% CI: 94.1-98.6%) versus 97% (95% CI: 94.1-98.6%), and 95.7% (95% CI: 92-97%) versus 92.5% (95% CI: 89-95%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori infection in Taiwan was 21.8% in asymptomatic adults in 2018. The Vstrip® HpSA had equivalent performance as the ImmunoCard STAT!® HpSA, and can be used in future mass screening of H. pylori infection for gastric cancer prevention.

Application of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test to survey the updated prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The reported prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan was 54.4% in 1992. An updated prevalence of H. pylori infection in asymptomatic adults is lacking in Taiwan. We aimed to assess the updated age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori infection in asymptomatic subjects and in patients with dyspepsia and to assess the accuracy of H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test for screening of H. pylori in Chinese population. METHODS: Asymptomatic adult subjects (N = 189) were screened for H. pylori infection using HpSA, serology, and 13 C-urea breath test (13 C-UBT) in 2016-2017. Adult patients with dyspepsia (N = 145) were screened for H. pylori using 13 C-UBT, HpSA, serology, rapid urease test, and histology during 2016-2018. Two types of HpSA, including the Diagnostec HpSA ELISA Kit (HpSA ELISA) and Rapid Test Kit (HpSA Rapid), were used in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the HpSA tests were calculated using the 13 C-UBT as golden standard test. RESULTS: The unadjusted prevalence of H. pylori was 21.2% in asymptomatic adults and 37.9% in patients with dyspepsia (P < 0.001). The age-standardized prevalence of H. pylori was 28.9% in asymptomatic adults in Taiwan. Of the 334 patients included for analysis, the area under the curve of HpSA ELISA test was 0.978, and the optimal cutoff value of optical density was 0.03. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the HpSA ELISA were 0.929, 0.983, and 0.967, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the HpSA Rapid were 0.929, 0.958, and 0.949, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of H. pylori infection has decreased in Taiwan. HpSA test is an accurate tool for screening of H. pylori in Chinese population.

Long-term changes of gut microbiota, antibiotic resistance, and metabolic parameters after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: In first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori, we have previously shown that the eradication frequency was 83·7% (95% CI 80·4-86·6) for triple therapy for 14 days (T14; lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg, all given twice daily), 85·9% (82·7-88·6) for concomitant therapy for 10 days (C10; lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all given twice daily), and 90·4% (87·6-92·6) for bismuth quadruple therapy for 10 days (BQ10; bismuth tripotassium dicitrate 300 mg four times a day, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg four times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day). In this follow-up study, we assess short-term and long-term effects of these therapies on the gut microbiota, antibiotic resistance, and metabolic parameters. METHODS: This was a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial done at nine medical centres in Taiwan. Adult patients (>20 years) with documented H pylori infection were randomly assigned (1:1:1, with block sizes of six) to receive T14, C10, or BQ10. We assessed long-term outcomes (reinfection frequency, changes in the gut microbiota, antibiotic resistance, and metabolic parameters) in patients with available data, excluding all protocol violators and those with unknown post-treatment H pylori status. Faecal samples were collected before treatment and 2 weeks, 2 months, and at least 1 year after eradication therapy. Amplification of the V3 and V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA was done followed by high-throughput sequencing. Susceptibility testing for faecal Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae was done. This trial is complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01906879. FINDINGS: Between July 17, 2013, and April 20, 2016, 1620 participants were randomly assigned to the three treatment groups (540 [33%] per group). 1214 (75%) attended 1-year follow-up and are included in this analysis. Compared with baseline, alpha diversity was significantly reduced 2 weeks after T14 (p=0·0002), C10 (p<0·0001), and BQ10 (p<0·0001) treatment. Beta diversity was also significantly altered 2 weeks after T14 (p=0·0010), C10 (p=0·0001), and BQ10 (p=0·0001). Alpha diversity and beta diversity were restored at week 8 (p=0·14 and p=0·918, respectively) and 1 year (p=0·14 and p=0·918) after T14, but were not fully recovered at week 8 and after 1 year in patients treated with C10 (p=0·0001 and p=0·013 at week 8; p=0·019 and p=0·064 at 1 year) and BQ10 (p<0·0001 and p=0·0002; p=0·001 and p=0·029). A transient increase at week 2 after T14 and C10 of the resistance rates of E coli to ampicillin-sulbactam (12% [15/127] to 66% [38/58] for T14, 7% [10/135] to 64% [28/44] for C10), cefazolin (13% [16/127] to 43% [25/58] for T14, 10% [13/135] to 41% [18/44] for C10), cefmetazole (8% [10/127] to 26% [15/58] for T14, 4% [5/135] to 18% [8/44] for C10), levofloxacin (8% [10/127] to 35% [20/58] for T14, 7% [10/135] to 32% [14/44] for C10), gentamicin (13% [19/146] to 47% [27/58] for T14, 15% [22/149] to 45% [20/44] for C10), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (33% [48/146] to 86% [50/58] for T14, 28% [42/148] to 86% [38/44] for C10; p<0·05 in paired samples in the above analyses) returned to basal state at week 8 and after 1 year. Although bodyweight and body-mass index slightly increased, there were significant improvements in metabolic parameters, with a decrease in insulin resistance, triglycerides, and LDL and an increase in HDL. Overall, there was no significant change in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome at week 8 and 1 year after T14, C10, and BQ10. INTERPRETATION: Eradication of H pylori infection has minimal disruption of the microbiota, no effect on antibiotic resistance of E coli, and some positive effects on metabolic parameters. Collectively, these results lend support to the long-term safety of H pylori eradication therapy. FUNDING: National Taiwan University Hospital and Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.

Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Concomitant Therapy vs. Triple Therapy for the First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection.

BACKGROUND: Whether concomitant therapy is superior to triple therapy of various treatment lengths for the first-line treatment of H. pylori remains controversial. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of concomitant therapy and triple therapy given for 5-14 days. METHODS: Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of concomitant therapy for 5-14 days and proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (PAC)-based triple therapy for 5-14 days in the first-line treatment of adult patients with H. pylori infection published from 1990 to January 2018 were searched from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Abstracts from international annual conferences were also searched. The primary and secondary outcomes were the eradication rate according to the intention-to-treat analysis and the adverse effects, respectively. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to treatment length. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017081328. RESULTS: Of the 639 articles identified, 23 RCTs including 3305 patients in the concomitant therapy group and 3327 patients in the triple therapy group were eligible. Overall, concomitant therapy was superior to triple therapy [risk ratio (RR): 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.21; p < 0.001]. However, there were significant heterogeneity (I2 = 74.0%, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, 5-day concomitant therapy was superior to 5-day triple therapy (RR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.04-1.62; p = 0.02), 5- or 7-day concomitant therapy was superior to 7-day triple therapy (RR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.12-1.21; p < 0.001), and 5- or 7-, or 10- or 14-day concomitant therapy was superior to 10-day triple therapy (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.08-1.23; p < 0.001). However, 5- or 10-day concomitant therapy was not superior to 14-day triple therapy (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.89-1.16; p = 0.796). The frequency of adverse effects was significantly higher in concomitant therapy than triple therapy (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06-1.34; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant therapy given for 5 or 10 days was superior to 5- or 7-, or 10-day PAC-based triple therapy, but was not superior to 14-day triple therapy.

Efficacies of Genotypic Resistance-Guided vs Empirical Therapy for Refractory Helicobacter pylori Infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to compare the efficacy of genotypic resistance-guided therapy vs empirical therapy for eradication of refractory Helicobacter pylori infection in randomized controlled trials. METHODS: We performed 2 multicenter, open-label trials of patients with H pylori infection (20 years or older) failed by 2 or more previous treatment regimens, from October 2012 through September 2017 in Taiwan. The patients were randomly assigned to groups given genotypic resistance-guided therapy for 14 days (n = 21 in trial 1, n = 205 in trial 2) or empirical therapy according to medication history for 14 days (n = 20 in trial 1, n = 205 in trial 2). Patients received sequential therapy containing esomeprazole and amoxicillin for the first 7 days, followed by esomeprazole and metronidazole, with levofloxacin, clarithromycin, or tetracycline (doxycycline in trial 1, tetracycline in trial 2) for another 7 days (all given twice daily) based on genotype markers of resistance determined from gastric biopsy specimens (group A) or empirical therapy according to medication history. Resistance-associated mutations in 23S ribosomal RNA or gyrase A were identified by polymerase chain reaction with direct sequencing. Eradication status was determined by 13C-urea breath test. The primary outcome was eradication rate. RESULTS: H pylori infection was eradicated in 17 of 21 (81%) patients receiving genotype resistance-guided therapy and 12 of 20 (60%) patients receiving empirical therapy (P = .181) in trial 1. This trial was terminated ahead of schedule due to the low rate of eradication in patients given doxycycline sequential therapy (15 of 26 [57.7%]). In trial 2, H pylori infection was eradicated in 160 of 205 (78%) patients receiving genotype resistance-guided therapy and 148 of 205 (72.2%) patients receiving empirical therapy (P = .170), according to intent to treat analysis. The frequencies of adverse effects and compliance did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Properly designed empirical therapy, based on medication history, is an acceptable alternative to genotypic resistance-guided therapy for eradication of refractory H pylori infection after consideration of accessibility, cost, and patient preference. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01725906.

14 day sequential therapy versus 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy containing high-dose esomeprazole in the first-line and second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomized trial.

Background: Whether extending the treatment length and the use of high-dose esomeprazole may optimize the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication remains unknown. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of optimized 14 day sequential therapy and 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy containing high-dose esomeprazole in first-line therapy. Methods: We recruited 620 adult patients (≥20 years of age) with H. pylori infection naive to treatment in this multicentre, open-label, randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 14 day sequential therapy or 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy, both containing esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily. Those who failed after 14 day sequential therapy received rescue therapy with 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy and vice versa. Our primary outcome was the eradication rate in the first-line therapy. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03156855. Results: The eradication rates of 14 day sequential therapy and 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy were 91.3% (283 of 310, 95% CI 87.4%-94.1%) and 91.6% (284 of 310, 95% CI 87.8%-94.3%) in the ITT analysis, respectively (difference -0.3%, 95% CI -4.7% to 4.4%, P = 0.886). However, the frequencies of adverse effects were significantly higher in patients treated with 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy than those treated with 14 day sequential therapy (74.4% versus 36.7% P < 0.0001). The eradication rate of 14 day sequential therapy in strains with and without 23S ribosomal RNA mutation was 80% (24 of 30) and 99% (193 of 195), respectively (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Optimized 14 day sequential therapy was non-inferior to, but better tolerated than 10 day bismuth quadruple therapy and both may be used in first-line treatment in populations with low to intermediate clarithromycin resistance.

Impact of amoxicillin resistance on the efficacy of amoxicillin-containing regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: analysis of five randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: The impact of amoxicillin resistance on the efficacy of regimens containing amoxicillin for Helicobacter pylori eradication remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the efficacy of an amoxicillin-containing regimen is affected by amoxicillin resistance and to identify the optimal breakpoint for amoxicillin resistance. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of five randomized trials conducted in Taiwan from 2007 to 2016. Patients who received amoxicillin-containing regimens were recruited. MICs were determined by agar dilution testing. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk ratio of eradication failure in amoxicillin-resistant strains compared with susceptible strains of seven different regimens. We performed further the pooled analysis and logistic regression in patients treated with clarithromycin triple therapy to identify the optimal breakpoint for amoxicillin resistance. RESULTS: A total of 2339 patients with available amoxicillin MICs were enrolled. Meta-analysis showed that the presence of amoxicillin resistance was consistently associated with increased risk of treatment failure of amoxicillin-containing regimens at different breakpoints (risk ratio: 1.41, 95% CI 1.12-1.78, P = 0.004 when the cut-off was 0.5 mg/L). The heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0%, P = 0.615). Pooled analysis also showed that amoxicillin resistance was an independent risk factor for treatment failure of clarithromycin triple therapy at different breakpoints. The best correlation was observed when the breakpoint of amoxicillin resistance was ≥0.125 mg/L (kappa coefficient 0.298), at which the resistance rate was 11.1% (110 of 990). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacies of amoxicillin-containing regimens are affected by amoxicillin resistance and the optimal breakpoint MIC is ≥ 0.125 mg/L.

Distinct Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Helicobacter pylori Negative Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Whether the characteristics and prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) are different in patients with and without Helicobacter pylori (HP) remains controversial. The definitions of HP status in patients with atrophic gastritis but negative tests for HP are heterogeneous. We aimed to assess the impact of HP on the prognosis of GC using different definitions. METHODS: From 1998 Nov to 2011 Jul, five hundred and sixty-seven consecutive patients with GC were included. HP status was determined by serology and histology. Patients with any positive test were defined as HP infection. Patients without HP infection whose serum pepsinogen (PG) I <70 ng/dl and PG I/II ratio < 3.0 were defined as atrophic gastritis and they were categorized into model 1: HP positive; model 2: HP negative; and model 3: exclusion of these patients. RESULTS: We found four characteristics of HP negative GC in comparison to HP positive GC: (1) higher proportion of the proximal tumor location (24.0%, P = 0.004), (2) more diffuse histologic type (56.1%, p = 0.008), (3) younger disease onset (58.02 years, p = 0.008) and (4) more stage IV disease (40.6%, p = 0.03). Patients with negative HP had worse overall survival (24.0% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.035). In Cox regression models, the negative HP status is an independent poor prognostic factor (HR: 1.34, CI:1.04-1.71, p = 0.019) in model 1, especially in stage I, II and III patients (HR: 1.62; CI:1.05-2.51,p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: We found the distinct characteristics of HP negative GC. The prognosis of HP negative GC was poor.

Concomitant, bismuth quadruple, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Whether concomitant therapy is superior to bismuth quadruple therapy or 14-day triple therapy for the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection remains poorly understood. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10-day concomitant therapy, 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, and 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment of H pylori. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised trial, we recruited adult patients (aged >20 years) with H pylori infection from nine medical centres in Taiwan. Patients who had at least two positive tests from the rapid urease test, histology, culture, or serology or who had a single positive 13C-urea breath test for gastric cancer screening were eligible for enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either concomitant therapy (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all given twice daily) for 10 days; bismuth quadruple therapy (bismuth tripotassium dicitrate 300 mg four times a day, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, tetracycline 500 mg four times a day, and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day) for 10 days; or triple therapy (lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg, all given twice daily) for 14 days. A computer-generated permuted block randomisation sequence with a block size of 6 was used for randomisation, and the sequence was concealed in an opaque envelope until the intervention was assigned. Investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the eradication frequency of H pylori with first-line therapy assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01906879. FINDINGS: Between July 17, 2013, and April 20, 2016, 5454 patients were screened for eligibility. Of these, 1620 patients were randomly assigned in this study. The eradication frequencies were 90·4% (488/540 [95% CI 87·6-92·6]) for 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, 85·9% (464/540 [82·7-88·6]) for 10-day concomitant therapy, and 83·7% (452/540 [80·4-86·6]) for 14-day triple therapy in the intention-to-treat analysis. 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy was superior to 14-day triple therapy (difference 6·7% [95% CI 2·7-10·7, p=0·001), but not 10-day concomitant therapy. 10-day concomitant therapy was not superior to 14-day triple therapy. The frequency of adverse events was 67% (358/533) in patients treated with 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy, 58% (309/535) in patients treated with 10-day concomitant therapy, and 47% (252/535) in patients treated with 14-day triple therapy. INTERPRETATION: Bismuth quadruple therapy is preferable to 14-day triple therapy in the first-line treatment in the face of rising prevalence of clarithromycin resistance. Concomitant therapy given for 10 days might not be optimum and a longer treatment length should be considered. FUNDING: National Taiwan University Hospital and Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan.